Porn~~the all American fun family activity

What's that saying? The family that poses together, stays together?

Oops, that's NOT right. Was it offensive? It was meant to be.

Pornography has become such a "normal" thing in society that soon, you WILL see families posing together in pornographic magazines.

It use to be delivered in a brown paper wrapper. I remember seeing it delivered to my friend's dad every month. I vividly remember when my friend found his dad's "stash" of magazines. Yes, we looked. It was forbidden; so we looked. I don't really recall my friends reaction. But I remember the guilt. It was the only time I viewed those materials. Because, I didn't want my life ruled by a worldly pleasure that gave me guilt. I KNEW at 12, it was WRONG. Now, at nearly 50, it is still WRONG.

But it no longer comes wrapped in a brown paper package. No, today we show it on primetime tv; in the movie house; in catalogs; in commercials~~such as for hamburgers no less, the all American food.

We let little girls dress in provocative styles, prancing around in commercials selling those same clothes to our daughters.

And then wonder what the hell is wrong with those men (pedophiles) who lust after them.

Well, America, what the hell is wrong with YOU for allowing your daughters to dress this way?

What the hell is wrong with a nation that considers pornography just healthy, clean, fun?

A lot!

Ask the spouses of those who have become addicted; yes, addicted; to pornography. How has it affected their families? Do they feel BETRAYED? CHEATED ON? HURT? REJECTED? ANGRY? ABANDONED? JEALOUS?

What were the consequences when it was found out that a spouse was cheating on them with the computer and pornography? Seperation? DIVORCE?

The consequences far outweigh any short term gratification experienced. But then again, the people of this nation have become addicted to "instant gratification" and damned be the consequences.

Top of Page

Informed Consent Laws

work to Stop Abortions!

from Agape Press

...An informed consent law put in place in Minnesota by a government health department appears to be working, as evident from the state's lowest abortion rate since 1975.

A study of abortion statistics released by the Center for Health Statistics for the Department of Health for the period January to December 2004 shows that more than 2,000 women changed their minds about having an abortion after receiving information supplied in accordance with the law.

The law, known as the Women's Right to Know, requires a waiting period before aborting and provides full information regarding the nature of abortion.

"This clearly shows that Women's Right to Know is working," says Scott Fischbach, executive director of Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life -- a key supporter of the law.

[Way to go Minnesota!]

Top of Page

Rampant Teenage Sex

[This one is a doozy....]

from Slate

[According to the Washington Post, The Boston Herald, and the Las Angelos Times oral sex is rampant among teenagers!

This is just one of those "well, duh" moments. Hollywood AND television glamorize the promiscuous lifestyle and really have become quite blatant or graphic in their depictions of "simulated" sex. Gee, guys, way to go~~what a wonderful role model you all have become!

But according to Slate, there is another horrific rise in teenage sexual experimentation~~of which they said it best:]

Ass Backwards
The media's silence about rampant anal sex.
By William Saletan

"Talking to your kids about oral sex is the easy part.[Did I hear a huge gasp out there?] If you're going to be frank about the most dangerous widespread activity revealed in the survey, you're looking at the wrong end of the digestive tract.

There's no delicate way to put this, so I'll just quote the survey report:

For males, the proportion who have had anal sex with a female increases from 4.6 percent at age 15 to 34 percent at ages 22–24; for females, the proportion who have had anal sex with a male increases from 2.4 percent at age 15 to 32 percent at age 22–24.

One in three women admits to having had anal sex by age 24. By ages 25 to 44, the percentages rise to 40 for men and 35 for women. And that's not counting the 3.7 percent of men aged 15 to 44 who've had anal sex with other men."

[While STD's can be transmitted through oral sex, it is more difficult to contract them this way; however, anal sex transmits these diseases quite effectively. Check out the CDC's report earlier this year]

"...the probability of HIV acquisition by the receptive partner in unprotected oral sex with an HIV carrier is one per 10,000 acts. In vaginal sex, it's 10 per 10,000 acts. In anal sex, it's 50 per 10,000 acts.

Do the math. Oral sex is 10 times safer than vaginal sex. Anal sex is five times more dangerous than vaginal sex and 50 times more dangerous than oral sex. Presumably, oral sex is far more frequent than anal sex. But are you confident it's 50 times more frequent?


If you live in Bergen County, N.J., congratulations. You get the only newspaper in the world that mentioned heterosexual anal sex, albeit briefly, in its write-up of the survey. Two other papers buried it in lines of statistics below their articles; the rest completely ignored it. [Typical~~majority of these papers only report whatever supports their agendas for the day, week, month, year.....]

Evidently anal sex is too icky to mention in print. But not too icky to have been tried by 35 percent of young women and 40 to 44 percent of young men—or to have killed some of them.

The spin that activists, scholars, and journalists have put on the survey—that abstinence-only sex education is driving teenagers to an epidemic of oral sex—doesn't hold up. As the survey report notes, data 'suggest that there was little or no change (accounting for sampling error) in the proportion of males 15-19 who had ever had heterosexual oral or anal sex between 1995 and 2002.' The more interesting numbers are in the next age bracket up—and the next orifice down.

I understand why we fixate on the oral sex numbers. Even liberals can digest sexual revolutions only one taboo at a time. We think oral sex is the new frontier. We think talking about it in print and sex education classes makes us hip and candid. It doesn't."

[By NOT teaching chastity (abstinence) and purity, to our young people ~~just makes us accomplices to murder..theirs..when they die from lack of guidance from the supposed "community who is supposed to be raising them": it takes a village~~well, the villages in America have earned an 'F' on their ability to raise children. Then the intrusive courts are undermining parental authority every chance they get.

Umm, IF I was a conspiracy theorist, I'd say there is some sort of global population control going on here. After all, sick people can't fight the "system"; and the future of ANY NATION is their YOUNG PEOPLE.]



Top of Page

Gay Activists After Churches

from Agape Press
by Jim Brown

[busting agenda's comments will be enclosed in parentheses.]

"...the Presbyterian Church (USA) has defied scriptural requirements and the denomination's official stance on homosexual ordination."

[Just one among many in today's "politically correct" environment. ]

"South Presbyterian Church in Dobbs Ferry, New York, recently ordained a homosexual man who refuses to abide by the denomination's ban on practicing homosexuals in the ministry. According to an Associated Press (AP) report, when the homosexual pastor was asked whether he would abide by the church's constitution, he said he would -- except for a measure that says ministers must practice fidelity if married and chastity if single."

[Well, ok then. If this pastor can practice homosexual fornication, then his congregants can't be chastised when they want to commit adultery, rape, murder, theft, {insert your choice of sin here!}. Because you cannot be unrepentant and expect your congregation to do so. Or in a worldly viewpoint: what is good for the goose is good for the gander.....OR how about that "Do as I say and not as I do" philosophy?]

"Dr. Parker T. Williamson with the Presbyterian Lay Committee says homosexual activists in the denomination have been trying to take ordination standards out of the church's constitution for years."

[Why is it so important to these activists to join churches or organizations that do not want them? Why not just go start your own Gay Boy Scouts clubs? Gay church? Gay Girls of America? Why INSIST on joining where you are NOT wanted? I suspect that is the very reason why they do it. They are going to force everyone to acknowledge their lifestyle choices or die trying. The thing is, they can try all they want. There are those of us who will just as adamantly NOT give in to their demands. That is OUR right to choose.]


Top of Page